|
OSHA
[ Tutorial ]
[ Hot Topics ]
[ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ]
[ LOTO preamble ]
[ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ]
[ Selected letters of interpretation ]
Question 2 for Case Study 1:
The employer argues that the roll cleaning activity is
routine, repetitive, and integral to the production operation and that lockout is not
required because the minor servicing exception described in 1910.147(a)(2)(ii) is
applicable. Is the employer correct?
<<Return to Case Study
Discussion
| 
