Lockout/Tagout 
Overview 
Background 
Services 
Software 
Training 
Our Clients 
Lockouts Explained 
Lockout Samples 
Terms & Definitions 
F.A.Q. 
OSHA 
Request For Information 

 Products & Services 
Lockout/Tagout 
Arc Flash  
Evacuation Plans 
Preventive Maintenance 
Military Documentation 
Technical Writing 
Technical Training 
Visual Aids & Illustrations 
Software & Multimedia 
Industrial Signage 

 Other Options 
Contact Us 
EHS Insider 
HOME 





OSHA

[ Tutorial ] [ Hot Topics ] [ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ] [ LOTO preamble ] [ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ] [ Selected letters of interpretation ]

Case Study 2: Automotive Component Lubrication Robotics

Correct.

The unjamming of the robot arm does not meet each of the required criteria for the minor servicing exception; thus, this exception does not apply. Specifically, the unjamming operation does not take place during normal production operations, as specified in the minor servicing exception note to 1910.147(a)(2)(ii). In addition, the unjamming operation does not use alternative measures which provide effective protection.


<<Return to Case Study DiscussionQuestion 3>>

 

Call Toll Free 888.741.8252 | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português ©2024 St. Claire, inc.