|
OSHA
[ Tutorial ]
[ Hot Topics ]
[ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ]
[ LOTO preamble ]
[ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ]
[ Selected letters of interpretation ]
Question 5 for Case Study 2:
The employer contends that deenergizing and locking out a
robot wipes out the robot's memory and requires time-consuming reprogramming. Based on
this alone, could the employer claim that shutting down the robot was impractical and
thus, claim that the unjamming task was exempted?
<<Return to Case Study
Discussion
| 
