Lockout/Tagout 
Overview 
Background 
Services 
Software 
Training 
Our Clients 
Lockouts Explained 
Lockout Samples 
Terms & Definitions 
F.A.Q. 
OSHA 
Request For Information 

 Products & Services 
Lockout/Tagout 
Arc Flash  
Evacuation Plans 
Preventive Maintenance 
Military Documentation 
Technical Writing 
Technical Training 
Visual Aids & Illustrations 
Software & Multimedia 
Industrial Signage 

 Other Options 
Contact Us 
EHS Insider 
HOME 





OSHA

[ Tutorial ] [ Hot Topics ] [ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ] [ LOTO preamble ] [ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ] [ Selected letters of interpretation ]

Case Study 3: Replacement of Nitrogen Pressure Vessel Seals

Incorrect.  Not in this case.

The Lockout/Tagout standard does not specifically require the use of a work authorization permit. An employer may choose to use a generic energy control procedure and a work authorization permit to meet the requirements of 1910.147(c)(4). If the employer uses this method, the work authorization permit must identify the equipment to be serviced or maintained, the types and unique energy characteristics to be encountered, methods for safe work, and the process or procedures to be used to safely accomplish the task. The company procedure must specify that the employees are required to perform their work in accordance with the terms and limitations of the work permit.

For more information: Refer to the April 10, 1991, letter of interpretation to Mr. Duane Barns, Dow Chemical U.S.A., for further details.

 


<<Return to Case Study DiscussionNext Case Study>>


 

Call Toll Free 888.741.8252 | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português ©2024 St. Claire, inc.