Lockout/Tagout 
Overview 
Background 
Services 
Software 
Training 
Our Clients 
Lockouts Explained 
Lockout Samples 
Terms & Definitions 
F.A.Q. 
OSHA 
Request For Information 

 Products & Services 
Lockout/Tagout 
Arc Flash  
Evacuation Plans 
Preventive Maintenance 
Military Documentation 
Technical Writing 
Technical Training 
Visual Aids & Illustrations 
Software & Multimedia 
Industrial Signage 

 Other Options 
Contact Us 
EHS Insider 
HOME 





OSHA

[ Tutorial ] [ Hot Topics ] [ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ] [ LOTO preamble ] [ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ] [ Selected letters of interpretation ]

Case Study 5: Sour Water Pipeline Repairs

Incorrect.  Actually, a blanking and tagging list is a required component in this case.

The employer's energy control program required the use of a blanking and tagging list to identify specific isolation points as part of the work authorization permit system. As a result, the blanking and tagging list is an integral part of, and must accompany, the work authorization permit. In this case study, the employer used a blanking and tagging list; however, the employer failed to maintain documentation of this list to ensure consistent and safe application of the energy control procedure.

Moreover, failing to retain the list will prevent an effective periodic inspection of the lockout procedure. See the September 19, 1995, letter of interpretation to Mr. Halprin.


<<Return to Case Study DiscussionQuestion 4>>

 

 

Call Toll Free 888.741.8252 | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português ©2024 St. Claire, inc.