|
OSHA
[ Tutorial ]
[ Hot Topics ]
[ Case Studies ]
[ LOTO standard ]
[ LOTO preamble ]
[ Compliance directive ]
[ Selected case law ]
[ Selected letters of interpretation ]
Case Study 5: Sour Water Pipeline Repairs
Incorrect. Here, the employer has not met the requirements.
Prior to the start of work, the authorized employees did not personally verify the
isolation of the two sour water valves at the tank farm, as required by 1910.147(d)(6) and (f)(3)(ii)(D).
<<Return to Case Study
Discussion | Question 6>>
| 
